https://plus.google.com/u/0/103325320769510649173/posts?rel=author Sitemap: http://www.divorceattorneyfortlauderdale.net/sitemapindex.xml
Contact us: (954) 246-3748

Social media restrictions after divorce: a Twitter gag order

The Miami Heat open the defense of their Natonal Basketball Associatoin title tomorrow evening. It’s a suitable event, then, to devote a post to what can be learned about divorce and social media from a recent case involving a prominent basketball player.

No, we aren’t describing the Heat’s Dwayne Wade. It holds true that in previous posts we have actually discussed some of the divorce concerns Wade has dealt with. For instance, we discussed him in our June 10 post on shared parenting– as an example of an unusual case in which the father got custody of the kids.

In this post, we will talk about, rather, the recent developments in the separation of an additional NBA star, Steve Nash. The case is intriguing because it raises the issue of constraints on social networks use by partners after separation.

For readers who do not follow basketball, we should mention that Steve Nash is a previous two-time winner of the NBA’s greatest specific honor, the most valuable player award. After stints with the Dallas Mavericks and Phoenix Suns, he now bets the Los Angeles Lakers.

Nash and his other half, who still stays in Arizona, got a divorce. In their divorce settlement, the two celebrations agreed not to disparage each various other online.

In spite of that contract, nonetheless, Nash’s ex-wife required to Twitter with remarks slamming Nash and advertising their separation disagreements. Last summer season, a court in the Phoenix location imposed a gag order aimed at preventing Nash and his ex-wife from making such remarks about each other on social media sites.

That order was subsequently supported by the Arizona Court of Appeals. The court reasoned that, since of the general public attention that comes with Nash’s job, it was acceptable for the court to enforce limitations on his ex-wife’s exclusive messages. This is because, with somebody in the public eye, it is much easier for personal conversations conducted on social media websites to end up being public.

Source: Phoenix Brand Journal, “What Steve Nash’s divorce cdan teach brands, employees about social networks,” Mike Sunnucks, Oct. 17, 2013